Re: [PATCH v2 02/29] slub: fix slab_state for slub

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/16/2012 01:55 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:

When the slub code wants to know if the sysfs state has already been
initialized, it tests for slab_state == SYSFS. This is quite fragile,
since new state can be added in the future (it is, in fact, for
memcg caches). This patch fixes this behavior so the test matches
= SYSFS, as all other state does.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: David Rientjes<rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>

Can be merged now, there's no dependency on the rest of this patchset.

So, is anyone taking this? I plan another submission this week, let me know if I should include these two patches or not.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]