On Wed, 16 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > On 05/15/2012 12:15 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > In the far future one could envision that the current allocators will > > just become storage algorithms that can be chosen based on the need of > > the subsystem. F.e. > > > > Cpu cache dependend performance = Bonwick allocator (SLAB) > > Minimal cycle count and cache footprint = SLUB > > Maximum storage density = SLOB > > While we are at it, do we plan to lift the vowel-only usage restriction and > start allowing consonants for the 3rd letter? We're running short of vowels, > so we can only accommodate 2 more allocators if this restriction stays. Well if we go to storage algorithms then we can have free naming. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>