Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] mm/memory_hotplug: check for fatal signals only in offline_pages()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 27-06-23 13:22:16, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's check for fatal signals only. That looks cleaner and still keeps
> the documented use case for manual user-space triggered memory offlining
> working. From Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst:
> 
> 	% timeout $TIMEOUT offline_block | failure_handling
> 
> In fact, we even document there: "the offlining context can be terminated
> by sending a fatal signal".

We should be fixing documentation instead. This could break users who do
have a SIGALRM signal hander installed.

> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 8e0fa209d533..0d2151df4ee1 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1879,7 +1879,7 @@ int __ref offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	do {
>  		pfn = start_pfn;
>  		do {
> -			if (signal_pending(current)) {
> +			if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
>  				ret = -EINTR;
>  				reason = "signal backoff";
>  				goto failed_removal_isolated;
> -- 
> 2.40.1

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux