On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:28:20AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote: > > Or is that wrapper only used for never-fail SEAMCALLs? If so, please > > document it. > > > > How about adding below? > > Use __seamcall() directly in cases that printing error message isn't > desired, e.g., when SEAMCALL can legally fail with BUSY and the caller > wants to retry. > Looks good to me. -- Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
