On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 09:30:07PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 06:35:16PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > + for (folio = writeback_iter_init(mapping, wbc);
> > + folio;
> > + folio = writeback_get_next(mapping, wbc)) {
>
> Ok that's another way to structure it. Guess I should look over the
> whole series first..
That beeing said. Given that writeback_iter_init calls
writeback_get_next anyway,
writeback_iter_init(mapping, wbc);
while ((folio = writeback_get_next(mapping, wbc)))
still feels a little easier to follow to be. No hard feelings either
way, just an observation.
