On (23/06/21 13:41), Alexey Romanov wrote:
[..]
> > +static bool zspage_empty(struct zspage *zspage)
> > +{
> > + return get_zspage_inuse(zspage) == 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * zs_lookup_class_index() - Returns index of the zsmalloc &size_class
> > * that hold objects of the provided size.
> > @@ -1787,6 +1792,10 @@ static void migrate_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool, struct size_class *class,
> > obj_idx++;
> > record_obj(handle, free_obj);
> > obj_free(class->size, used_obj, NULL);
> > +
> > + /* Stop if there are no more objects to migrate */
> > + if (zspage_empty(get_zspage(s_page)))
> > + break;
> > }
>
> Yes it seems my version is not as good as I thought. Looks bad for an
> architecturally dependent PAGE_SIZE. [..]
Well, we are looking for a solution that is both reasonable (perf wise)
and is maintainable.
> I can implement this option. I'll test this and send patch this week.
Either that or, if Suggested-by: Alexey Romanov <AVRomanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
is good enough for you, then I can send a series tonight or tomorrow (after
some testing). I have two more patches on top of that one.
