Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] mm/hugetlb: Prepare hugetlb_follow_page_mask() for FOLL_PIN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20.06.23 01:10, Peter Xu wrote:
follow_page() doesn't use FOLL_PIN, meanwhile hugetlb seems to not be the
target of FOLL_WRITE either.  However add the checks.

Namely, either the need to CoW due to missing write bit, or proper CoR on
!AnonExclusive pages over R/O pins to reject the follow page.  That brings
this function closer to follow_hugetlb_page().

So we don't care before, and also for now.  But we'll care if we switch
over slow-gup to use hugetlb_follow_page_mask().  We'll also care when to
return -EMLINK properly, as that's the gup internal api to mean "we should
do CoR".  Not really needed for follow page path, though.

When at it, switching the try_grab_page() to use WARN_ON_ONCE(), to be
clear that it just should never fail.

Oh, and does this comment really belong into this patch or am I confused?

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux