On Thu 15-06-23 22:13:09, 贺中坤 wrote: > > This is not really answering my question though. memcg under hard limit > > is not really my concern. This is a simpler case. I am not saying it > > doesn't need to get addresses but it is the memcg hard limited case that > > is much more interested. Because your charges are going to fail very > > likely and that would mean that swapout would fail AFAIU. If my > > understanding is wrong then it would really help to describe that case > > much more in the changelog. > > > > OK, Got it. In many cases I have tested, it will not fail because we did > not charge the page directly，but the objects(like slab,compressed page), > for the zspage may be shared by any memcg. That sounds like a broken design to me. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
