On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 14:08 +0300, kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:58:13AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote: > > > And the platform has to > > > handle erratum in BIOS to reset memory status on reboot anyway. > > > > So "handle erratum in BIOS" I think you mean "warm reset" doesn't reset TDX > > private pages, and the BIOS needs to disable "warm reset". > > > > IIUC this means the kernel needs to depend on specific BIOS setting to work > > normally, and IIUC the kernel even cannot be aware of this setting? > > > > Should the kernel just reset all TDX private pages when erratum is present > > during reboot so the kernel doesn't depend on BIOS? > > Kernel cannot really function if we don't trust BIOS to do its job. Kernel > depends on BIOS services anyway. We cannot try to handle everything in > kernel just in case BIOS drops the ball. > In other words, I assume we just need to take care of kexec(). The current patch tries to handle reboot too, so I'll change to only cover kexec(), assuming the BIOS will always disable warm reset reboot for platforms with this erratum. Thanks.
