David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 13.06.23 13:13, Baolin Wang wrote: >> On 6/13/2023 5:56 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> On 13.06.23 10:55, Baolin Wang wrote: >>>> On some machines, the normal zone can have a large memory hole like >>>> below memory layout, and we can see the range from 0x100000000 to >>>> 0x1800000000 is a hole. So when isolating some migratable pages, the >>>> scanner can meet the hole and it will take more time to skip the large >>>> hole. From my measurement, I can see the isolation scanner will take >>>> 80us ~ 100us to skip the large hole [0x100000000 - 0x1800000000]. >>>> >>>> So adding a new helper to fast search next online memory section >>>> to skip the large hole can help to find next suitable pageblock >>>> efficiently. With this patch, I can see the large hole scanning only >>>> takes < 1us. >>>> >>>> [ 0.000000] Zone ranges: >>>> [ 0.000000] DMA [mem 0x0000000040000000-0x00000000ffffffff] >>>> [ 0.000000] DMA32 empty >>>> [ 0.000000] Normal [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x0000001fa7ffffff] >>>> [ 0.000000] Movable zone start for each node >>>> [ 0.000000] Early memory node ranges >>>> [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000000040000000-0x0000000fffffffff] >>>> [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000001800000000-0x0000001fa3c7ffff] >>>> [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000001fa3c80000-0x0000001fa3ffffff] >>>> [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000001fa4000000-0x0000001fa402ffff] >>>> [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000001fa4030000-0x0000001fa40effff] >>>> [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000001fa40f0000-0x0000001fa73cffff] >>>> [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000001fa73d0000-0x0000001fa745ffff] >>>> [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000001fa7460000-0x0000001fa746ffff] >>>> [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000001fa7470000-0x0000001fa758ffff] >>>> [ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x0000001fa7590000-0x0000001fa7ffffff] >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> Changes from v1: >>>> - Fix building errors if CONFIG_SPARSEMEM is not selected. >>>> - Use NR_MEM_SECTIONS instead of '-1' per Huang Ying. >>>> --- >>>> include/linux/mmzone.h | 10 ++++++++++ >>>> mm/compaction.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>>> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h >>>> index 5a7ada0413da..5ff1fa2efe28 100644 >>>> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h >>>> @@ -2000,6 +2000,16 @@ static inline unsigned long >>>> next_present_section_nr(unsigned long section_nr) >>>> return -1; >>>> } >>>> +static inline unsigned long next_online_section_nr(unsigned long >>>> section_nr) >>>> +{ >>>> + while (++section_nr <= __highest_present_section_nr) { >>>> + if (online_section_nr(section_nr)) >>>> + return section_nr; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + return NR_MEM_SECTIONS; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> /* >>>> * These are _only_ used during initialisation, therefore they >>>> * can use __initdata ... They could have names to indicate >>>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c >>>> index 3398ef3a55fe..c31ff6123891 100644 >>>> --- a/mm/compaction.c >>>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c >>>> @@ -229,6 +229,28 @@ static void reset_cached_positions(struct zone >>>> *zone) >>>> pageblock_start_pfn(zone_end_pfn(zone) - 1); >>>> } >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM >>>> +static unsigned long skip_hole_pageblock(unsigned long start_pfn) >>>> +{ >>>> + unsigned long next_online_nr; >>>> + unsigned long start_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(start_pfn); >>>> + >>>> + if (online_section_nr(start_nr)) >>>> + return 0; >>>> + >>>> + next_online_nr = next_online_section_nr(start_nr); >>>> + if (next_online_nr < NR_MEM_SECTIONS) >>>> + return section_nr_to_pfn(next_online_nr); >>>> + >>> >>> I would simply inline next_online_section_nr and simplify (and add a >>> comment): >>> >>> /* >>> * If the PFN falls into an offline section, return the start PFN of the >>> * next online section. If the PFN falls into an online section or if >>> * there is no next online section, return 0. >>> */ >>> static unsigned long skip_hole_pageblock(unsigned long start_pfn) >>> { >>> unsigned long nr = pfn_to_section_nr(start_pfn); >>> >>> if (online_section_nr(nr)) >>> return 0; >>> >>> while (++nr <= __highest_present_section_nr) { >>> if (online_section_nr(nr)) >>> return section_nr_to_pfn(nr); >>> } >>> return 0 >>> } >>> >>> Easier, no? >> Originally I want to add a common helper like >> next_present_section_nr(), >> which can be used by other users. But yes, your suggestion is easier, >> and I am fine with that. >> >>> And maybe just call that function "skip_offline_sections()" then? >>> Because we're not operating on pageblocks. >> OK. Thanks. >> > > Feel free to add to the simplified version > > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> With David's above comments addressed, feel free to add Acked-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>