Re: Re: [PATCH] slub: missing test for partial pages flush work in flush_all

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Didn't I already ack this before?
>
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
>

>Yes, you did, but the patch description and title was lacking and
>Majianpeng kindly fixed it, hence the re-send, I guess.

>I've added Andrew, since he took my original commit that introduces
>the bug that this patch by Majianpeng  fixes (and also LKML).

>This fix really needs to get into 3.4, otherwise we'll be breaking
>slub. What's the best way to go about that?

>Thanks!
>Gilad


Sorry for late to relay. I rewrited the comment and resend.
I have a question to ask:because the patch fixed by others,for example Christoph Lameter, Gilad.
Should I add sogine-off by them in the patch?
																	Thanks all!

------------------				 
majianpeng
2012-05-14


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]