On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 2:12 AM Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm of the opinion that Rust wrappers should generally live in the same > directories as the code they're wrapping. The Rust wrappers are unsafe > code that is intimately coupled with the C code they're creating safe > interfaces for, and the organizational structure should reflect that. +1, that is the plan, which also means `MAINTAINERS` does not need extra `F` fields etc. Cheers, Miguel
