On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 1:06 PM Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Any wrappers and code for core fs should be maintained as part of fs. > Rust shouldn't become a way to avoid our reviews once you have a few > wrappers added somewhere. Definitely and, to be clear, we are strict about it (e.g. https://rust-for-linux.com/contributing#the-rust-subsystem). In fact, we appreciate maintainers that are willing to take patches through their tree and take ownership of code too (e.g. KUnit and DRM are doing so already). I imagine Ariel sent the RFC as a way to announce his work early on, especially given how some patches were split, the lack of commit messages and tags, etc. In other cases, we have reviewed patches privately first to iron out this sort of thing, but I wasn't aware of this series coming (I knew Ariel was working on puzzlefs and that he wanted to submit it eventually, but not that an RFC was ready). Also, some of the code here comes from the `rust` branch, but some of it may not be ready yet for upstreaming. Cheers, Miguel
