Re: [PATCH 2/6] add res_counter_uncharge_until()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 11 May 2012 18:47:06 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> At killing res_counter which is a child of other counter,
> we need to do
> 	res_counter_uncharge(child, xxx)
> 	res_counter_charge(parent, xxx)
> 
> This is not atomic and wasting cpu. This patch adds
> res_counter_uncharge_until(). This function's uncharge propagates
> to ancestors until specified res_counter.
> 
> 	res_counter_uncharge_until(child, parent, xxx)
> 
> Now, ops is atomic and efficient.
> 
> Changelog since v2
>  - removed unnecessary lines.
>  - Fixed 'From' , this patch comes from his series. Please signed-off-by if good.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Frederic's Signed-off-by: is unavaliable?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]