On 05/11/2012 02:53 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
struct page already have this information. If we start chaining
caches, this information will always be more trustworthy than
whatever is passed into the function
Other allocators may not have that information and this patch may
cause bugs to go unnoticed if the caller specifies the wrong slab cache.
Adding a VM_BUG_ON may be useful to make sure that kmem_cache_free is
always passed the correct slab cache.
Well, problem is , it isn't always passed the "correct" slab cache.
At least not after this series, since we'll have child caches associated
with the main cache.
So we'll pass, for instance, kmem_cache_free(dentry_cache...), but will
in fact free from the memcg copy of the dentry cache.
We can, of course, verify if the cache at least belongs to the same
"family". But that's quite expensive.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>