On Mon, 2023-06-05 at 14:23 -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 02:27:20AM +1200,
> Kai Huang <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> > index b489b5b9de5d..03f74851608f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h
> > @@ -102,8 +102,12 @@ static inline long tdx_kvm_hypercall(unsigned int nr, unsigned long p1,
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST
> > bool platform_tdx_enabled(void);
> > +int tdx_cpu_enable(void);
> > +int tdx_enable(void);
> > #else /* !CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST */
> > static inline bool platform_tdx_enabled(void) { return false; }
> > +static inline int tdx_cpu_enable(void) { return -ENODEV; }
> > +static inline int tdx_enable(void) { return -ENODEV; }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST */
> >
> > #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> Please include errno.h.
> In the case of !INTEL_TDX_HOST && INTEL_TDX_GUEST,
> drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c results in compile error.
>
> Although there are other files that include asm/tdx.h, they seem to luckily
> include errno.h directly or indirectly.
>
I've changed to -ENODEV which doesn't cause build error in my test.
I agree it's better to include errno.h explicitly but IMHO it's a problem in the
existing upstream code (tdx_kvm_hypercall() returns -ENODEV when INTEL_TDX_GUEST
is off), thus should be addressed in a separate patch but not folded into this
one.
Since now there's no build error, I hesitated to added such patch. I can do it
separately if it should be addressed.
