On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 08:33:03PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > There's nothing to warn about. The range (or part of it) is not > > represented in the bitmap because it is not unaccepted. > > Sorry but how am I supposed to know that?! > > I've read the whole patchset up until now and all text talks like *all* > *memory* needs to be accepted and before that has happeend, it is > unaccepted. > > So how about you explain that explicitly somewhere, perhaps in a comment > above accept_memory(), that the unaccepted range is not the whole memory > but only, well, what is unaccepted and the rest is implicitly accepted? Okay, will do. > And I went and looked at the final result - we error() if we fail > accepting. > > I guess that's the only action we can do anyway... Right, there's no recovery from the error. -- Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
