On 02/06/2023 17:35, Yu Zhao wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 3:30 AM Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> It is racy to non-atomically read a pte, then clear the young bit, then
>> write it back as this could discard dirty information. Further, it is
>> bad practice to directly set a pte entry within a table. Instead
>> clearing young must go through the arch-provided helper,
>> ptep_test_and_clear_young() to ensure it is modified atomically and to
>> give the arch code visibility and allow it to check (and potentially
>> modify) the operation.
>>
>> Fixes: 3f49584b262c ("mm/damon: implement primitives for the virtual memory address spaces").
>
> Just to double check: was "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" overlooked or
> deemed unnecessary?
It was overlooked - incompetance strikes again! I was intending to cc the whole
series. What's the best way to fix this? Can I just add stable in cc on reply to
the cover letter or will I have to resend the lot?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
