Re: Fwd: Started to get "memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/1/23 21:12, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Hm indeed it seems to have introduced 2 new flags and immediately warn if
>> any process doesn't use them. Maybe it would make sense for some of the
>> non-default values of vm.memfd_noexec, but it's too early to warn
>> unconditionally everywhere, no?
> 
> This is pretty standard for getting new options like this noticed by
> userspace -- there is no regression in _behavior_. It's just a reminder
> to fix userspace code.
> 

Telling regzbot:

#regzbot invalid: not a kernel regression, but userspace fix is needed

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux