Looks like Andrew wasn't CC'd on this one. Andrew, would you mind picking this up? Thanks! On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 08:32:27PM +0200, Domenico Cerasuolo wrote: > This update addresses an issue with the zswap reclaim mechanism, which > hinders the efficient offloading of cold pages to disk, thereby > compromising the preservation of the LRU order and consequently > diminishing, if not inverting, its performance benefits. > > The functioning of the zswap shrink worker was found to be inadequate, > as shown by basic benchmark test. For the test, a kernel build was > utilized as a reference, with its memory confined to 1G via a cgroup and > a 5G swap file provided. The results are presented below, these are > averages of three runs without the use of zswap: > > real 46m26s > user 35m4s > sys 7m37s > > With zswap (zbud) enabled and max_pool_percent set to 1 (in a 32G > system), the results changed to: > > real 56m4s > user 35m13s > sys 8m43s > > written_back_pages: 18 > reject_reclaim_fail: 0 > pool_limit_hit:1478 > > Besides the evident regression, one thing to notice from this data is > the extremely low number of written_back_pages and pool_limit_hit. > > The pool_limit_hit counter, which is increased in zswap_frontswap_store > when zswap is completely full, doesn't account for a particular > scenario: once zswap hits his limit, zswap_pool_reached_full is set to > true; with this flag on, zswap_frontswap_store rejects pages if zswap is > still above the acceptance threshold. Once we include the rejections due > to zswap_pool_reached_full && !zswap_can_accept(), the number goes from > 1478 to a significant 21578266. > > Zswap is stuck in an undesirable state where it rejects pages because > it's above the acceptance threshold, yet fails to attempt memory > reclaimation. This happens because the shrink work is only queued when > zswap_frontswap_store detects that it's full and the work itself only > reclaims one page per run. > > This state results in hot pages getting written directly to disk, > while cold ones remain memory, waiting only to be invalidated. The LRU > order is completely broken and zswap ends up being just an overhead > without providing any benefits. > > This commit applies 2 changes: a) the shrink worker is set to reclaim > pages until the acceptance threshold is met and b) the task is also > enqueued when zswap is not full but still above the threshold. > > Testing this suggested update showed much better numbers: > > real 36m37s > user 35m8s > sys 9m32s > > written_back_pages: 10459423 > reject_reclaim_fail: 12896 > pool_limit_hit: 75653 > > V2: > - loop against == -EAGAIN rather than != -EINVAL and also break the loop > on MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES (thanks Yosry) > - cond_resched() to ensure that the loop doesn't burn the cpu (thanks > Vitaly) > > V3: > - fix wrong loop break, should continue on !ret (thanks Johannes) > > Fixes: 45190f01dd40 ("mm/zswap.c: add allocation hysteresis if pool limit is hit") > Signed-off-by: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/zswap.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c > index 59da2a415fbb..bcb82e09eb64 100644 > --- a/mm/zswap.c > +++ b/mm/zswap.c > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ > #include <linux/workqueue.h> > > #include "swap.h" > +#include "internal.h" > > /********************************* > * statistics > @@ -587,9 +588,19 @@ static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w) > { > struct zswap_pool *pool = container_of(w, typeof(*pool), > shrink_work); > + int ret, failures = 0; > > - if (zpool_shrink(pool->zpool, 1, NULL)) > - zswap_reject_reclaim_fail++; > + do { > + ret = zpool_shrink(pool->zpool, 1, NULL); > + if (ret) { > + zswap_reject_reclaim_fail++; > + if (ret != -EAGAIN) > + break; > + if (++failures == MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES) > + break; > + } > + cond_resched(); > + } while (!zswap_can_accept()); > zswap_pool_put(pool); > } > > @@ -1188,7 +1199,7 @@ static int zswap_frontswap_store(unsigned type, pgoff_t offset, > if (zswap_pool_reached_full) { > if (!zswap_can_accept()) { > ret = -ENOMEM; > - goto reject; > + goto shrink; > } else > zswap_pool_reached_full = false; > } > -- > 2.34.1 >