On Mon 22-05-23 11:53:08, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 22-05-23 07:54:33, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > > This small SPDX conversion series targets UDF file system, which is > > splitted from v2 of my SPDX conversion series that is triggered by > > Didi's GPL full name fixes [1]. It is done to ease review. > > > > All boilerplates in fs/udf/ is converted, except fs/udf/ecma_167.h. > > The latter file apparently looks like 2-clause BSD Source-Code > > license, yet the second clause is from third clause of 3-Clause BSD. > > This custom license can't be expressed satisfiably in SPDX license > > identifier, hence the file doesn't get converted. > > > > This series is based on mm-nonmm-unstable branch. > > > > Changes since v1 [2]: > > * Correct SPDX tag for LGPL (correct spdxcheck warning) > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spdx/20230512100620.36807-1-bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx/ > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230517083344.1090863-1-bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Bagas Sanjaya (2): > > fs: udf: Replace GPL 2.0 boilerplate license notice with SPDX > > identifier > > fs: udf: udftime: Replace LGPL boilerplate with SPDX identifier > > The patches look good to me. So unless someone objects in a few days, I'll > queue them into my tree. Thanks! Patches queued now. Honza
