On 05/10/2012 09:47 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 5/10/12 10:02 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> struct zs {
>> void *ptr;
>> };
>>
>> And pass that structure around?
>>
>
> A minor problem is that we store this handle value in a radix tree node.
> If we wrap it as a struct, then we will not be able to store it directly
> in the node -- the node will have to point to a 'struct zs'. This will
> unnecessarily waste sizeof(void *) for every object stored.
I don't think so. You can use the fact that for a struct zs var, &var
and &var->ptr are the same.
For the structure above:
void * zs_to_void(struct zs *p) { return p->ptr; }
struct zs * void_to_zs(void *p) { return (struct zs *)p; }
Right?
--
Seth
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>