On 05/24/23 at 07:24pm, Baoquan He wrote: > On 05/24/23 at 11:51am, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, May 24 2023 at 17:25, Baoquan He wrote: > > > On 05/23/23 at 04:02pm, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > >> _vm_unmap_aliases() is used to ensure that no unflushed TLB entries for a > > >> page are left in the system. This is required due to the lazy TLB flush > > >> mechanism in vmalloc. > > >> > > >> This is tried to achieve by walking the per CPU free lists, but those do > > >> not contain fully utilized vmap blocks because they are removed from the > > >> free list once the blocks free space became zero. > > > > > > The problem description is not accurate. This is tried to achieve for > > > va associated with vmap_block by walking the per CPU free lists, those > > > fully utilized vmap blocks can still be flushed in __purge_vmap_area_lazy() > > > by calculating the [min:max] of purge_vmap_area_list, because va of > > > vmap_blocks will be added to purge_vmap_area_list too via vb_free(). > > > > No. The fully utilized block cannot be purged when there are still > > active mappings on it. Again: > > > > X = vb_alloc() > > ... > > Y = vb_alloc() > > vb->free -= order; > > if (!vb->vb_free) > > list_del(vb->free_list); > > ... > > vb_free(Y) > > vb->dirty += order; > > if (vb->dirty == VMAP_BBMAP_BITS) // Condition is _false_ > > free_block(); > > > vb_free(Y) > vb->dirty += order; > if (vb->dirty == VMAP_BBMAP_BITS) // Condition is _false_ > free_vmap_block(); > -->free_vmap_area_noflush() > -->merge_or_add_vmap_area(va, > &purge_vmap_area_root, &purge_vmap_area_list); > > The last mapped region will be freed and added to purge list via > vb_free(), it will be flushed with other va in purge list. When it's > mapped via vb_alloc(), it's detached from vbq->free list. When it's > freed via vb_alloc(), it's added to purge list, and flushed, the thing ~~~~~~~~vb_free(), typo, > is duplicated flushing, no missing flush seen here? > > > > > So because $X is not yet unmapped the block is neither on the free list > > nor on purge_vmap_area_list. > > Yeah, because $X is not yet unmapped, the block could have unmapped part > flushed, or unflushed. For unflushed part, it's got flushed with $X > altogether in the purge list. >