Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Applied, thanks!
>
> This ended up on the for-6.5/block branch, but I think it needs to be
> on the splice one, as that is pre-requisite unless I'm missing
> something.
Indeed. As I noted in the cover note:
This requires the splice-read patchset to have been applied first,
otherwise reversion of the ITER_PAGE iterator can race with truncate and
return pages to the allocator whilst they're still undergoing DMA[2].
David
