Re: [PATCH] memblock: update numa node of memblk reserved type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2023/5/24 12:59, Anshuman Khandual wrote:


On 5/23/23 17:27, Kefeng Wang wrote:
The numa node of memblk reserved type is wrong, it could update
according to the numa node information from memblk memory type,
let's fix it.

Indeed it's wrong at present and can be verified from sysfs file
(/sys/kernel/debug/memblock/reserved) accessed in user space.

Yes, both memblock_dump() and sysfs show wrong value.


Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/memblock.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index a50447d970ef..45a0781cda31 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -1922,6 +1922,28 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_get_current_limit(void)
  	return memblock.current_limit;
  }
+static void __init_memblock memblock_reserved_update_node(void)
+{
+	struct memblock_region *rgn;
+	phys_addr_t base, end, size;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA))
+		return;
+
+	for_each_mem_region(rgn) {
+		base = rgn->base;
+		size = rgn->size;
+		end = base + size - 1;
+
+		ret = memblock_set_node(base, size, &memblock.reserved,
+					memblock_get_region_node(rgn));
+		if (ret)
+			pr_err("memblock: Failed to update reserved [%pa-%pa] node",
+			       &base, &end);
+	}
+}
+
  static void __init_memblock memblock_dump(struct memblock_type *type)
  {
  	phys_addr_t base, end, size;
@@ -1955,6 +1977,7 @@ static void __init_memblock __memblock_dump_all(void)
  		&memblock.memory.total_size,
  		&memblock.reserved.total_size);
+ memblock_reserved_update_node();

__memblock_dump_all() gets called only when memblock_debug is enabled.
This helper should be called directly inside memblock_dump_all() right
at the beginning, regardless of memblock_debug.

This is my first though, but I found there are still many memblock_alloc and memblock_reserve after memblock_dump_all(), so I update it twice,

1) __memblock_dump_all()
2) memblock_debug_show()

and without the above two interface, no one care about the reserved node
info, so I put memblock_reserved_update_node into __memblock_dump_all().


  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
@@ -2196,6 +2219,8 @@ static int memblock_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *private)
  	unsigned int count = ARRAY_SIZE(flagname);
  	phys_addr_t end;
+ memblock_reserved_update_node();
+


This is redundant, should be dropped. Reserved memblock ranges need not
be scanned, each time the sysfs file is accessed from user space.

Yes, it's better to move it into memblock_init_debugfs(),
which only called once.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux