On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 01:08:44PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> +#define fbl(z, i, m) z->fbl[i].m
> +#define fbl_root(z, i) fbl(z, i, root)
> +#define fbl_head(z, i) fbl(z, i, head)
> +
> +#define fbl_lock(z, i) spin_lock(&fbl(z, i, lock))
> +#define fbl_unlock(z, i) spin_unlock(&fbl(z, i, lock))
Even if it is just temporary, I don't think adding these wrappers
make much sense.
> +struct cpu_vmap_zone {
> + /*
> + * FREE, BUSY, LAZY bookkeeping data of this CPU zone.
> + */
> + struct {
> + struct rb_root root;
> + struct list_head head;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + } fbl[NFBL];
Maybe replace NFBL with something longer and more descriptive?
But also in general it feels like this should be folded into a patch
doing real work. As-is it doesn't look very useful.
