Re: [PATCH 0/2] SPDX conversion for UDF

To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] SPDX conversion for UDF
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 21:17:50 -0700
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Actions <linux-actions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>, Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230517083344.1090863-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com>
References: <20230517083344.1090863-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com>

Shouldn't this include a Cc to the linuxx-spdx list, especially for
a review of the odd ecma_167.h clause?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] SPDX conversion for UDF
  - From: Bagas Sanjaya

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] SPDX conversion for UDF
  - From: Bagas Sanjaya