On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 09:58:26AM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote: > > and just define this to ioremap_wc. Note that defining _wt to _wc is > > very odd and seems wrong, but comes from the existing code. Maybe the > > s390 maintainers can chime on on the background and we can add a comment > > while we're at it. > > I'm a bit confused where you see ioremap_wt() defined to ioremap_wc() > in the existing code? Our current definitions are: No, it's me wo is confused. They clearly are different. But the same comment about just moving ioremap_wc applies to ioremap_wt based on how pgprot_writethrough is implemented then.
