From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 11:19:41 -0700 > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 01:37:52PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: >> alloc_bootmem_section() derives allocation area constraints from the >> specified sparsemem section. This is a bit specific for a generic >> memory allocator like bootmem, though, so move it over to sparsemem. >> >> As __alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic() already retries failed allocations >> with relaxed area constraints, the fallback code in sparsemem.c can be >> removed and the code becomes a bit more compact overall. >> >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > For 03-10 > > Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for doing this. While at it, maybe we can clear up the naming > mess there? I don't hate __s too much but the bootmem allocator > brings it to a whole new level. :( +1 And you can add my Ack to this series too, thanks Johannes: Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>