Re: [PATCH 03/10] maple_tree: Remove __must_hold() which does not work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] maple_tree: Remove __must_hold() which does not work
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 15:55:26 +0100
Cc: Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, maple-tree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230515131757.60035-4-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com>
References: <20230515131757.60035-1-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> <20230515131757.60035-4-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com>

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:17:50PM +0800, Peng Zhang wrote:
> The arguments to __must_hold() seem to be wrong so they should not work,
> remove them.

Why not fix them?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 03/10] maple_tree: Remove __must_hold() which does not work
  - From: Peng Zhang

References:
- [PATCH 00/10] Clean ups for maple tree
  - From: Peng Zhang
- [PATCH 03/10] maple_tree: Remove __must_hold() which does not work
  - From: Peng Zhang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC] kthread: Unify kernel_thread() and user_mode_thread()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 03/10] maple_tree: Remove __must_hold() which does not work
Previous by thread: [PATCH 03/10] maple_tree: Remove __must_hold() which does not work
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 03/10] maple_tree: Remove __must_hold() which does not work
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux