On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 01:46:09PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 12:56:32PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > This is needed for bcachefs, which dynamically generates per-btree node > > unpack functions. > > No, we will never add back a way for random code allocating executable > memory in kernel space. Yeah I think I glossed over this aspect a bit as it looks ostensibly like simply reinstating a helper function because the code is now used in more than one place (at lsf/mm so a little distracted :) But it being exported is a problem. Perhaps there's another way of acheving the same aim without having to do so?
