There is already a memory_failure_init(), don't add a new initcall,
move register_sysctl_init() into it to cleanup a bit.
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 11 ++---------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 5b663eca1f29..004a02f44271 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -123,7 +123,6 @@ const struct attribute_group memory_failure_attr_group = {
.attrs = memory_failure_attr,
};
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
static struct ctl_table memory_failure_table[] = {
{
.procname = "memory_failure_early_kill",
@@ -146,14 +145,6 @@ static struct ctl_table memory_failure_table[] = {
{ }
};
-static int __init memory_failure_sysctl_init(void)
-{
- register_sysctl_init("vm", memory_failure_table);
- return 0;
-}
-late_initcall(memory_failure_sysctl_init);
-#endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
-
/*
* Return values:
* 1: the page is dissolved (if needed) and taken off from buddy,
@@ -2441,6 +2432,8 @@ static int __init memory_failure_init(void)
INIT_WORK(&mf_cpu->work, memory_failure_work_func);
}
+ register_sysctl_init("vm", memory_failure_table);
+
return 0;
}
core_initcall(memory_failure_init);
--
2.35.3
