Re: [PATCH] zsmalloc: move LRU update from zs_map_object() to zs_malloc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 12:14 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri,  5 May 2023 11:50:54 -0700 Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Under memory pressure, we sometimes observe the following crash:
> >
> > [ 5694.832838] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 5694.842093] list_del corruption, ffff888014b6a448->next is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000000100)
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Am I correct in believing that we should backport this fix into earlier
> kernels?
>
> And that a suitable Fixes: target is 64f768c6b32e ("zsmalloc: add a LRU
> to zs_pool to keep track of zspages in LRU order)"?
>

Hi Andrew,

For both questions - yes I believe so too!





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux