Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] THP: avoid lock when check whether THP is in deferred list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ying,

On 5/5/2023 8:52 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> free_transhuge_page() acquires split queue lock then check
>> whether the THP was added to deferred list or not. It brings
>> high deferred queue lock contention.
>>
>> It's safe to check whether the THP is in deferred list or not
>> without holding the deferred queue lock in free_transhuge_page()
>> because when code hit free_transhuge_page(), there is no one
>> tries to add the folio to _deferred_list.
>>
>> Running page_fault1 of will-it-scale + order 2 folio for anonymous
>> mapping with 96 processes on an Ice Lake 48C/96T test box, we could
>> see the 61% split_queue_lock contention:
>> -   63.02%     0.01%  page_fault1_pro  [kernel.kallsyms]         [k] free_transhuge_page
>>    - 63.01% free_transhuge_page
>>       + 62.91% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
>>
>> With this patch applied, the split_queue_lock contention is less
>> than 1%.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks a lot for reviewing.

Regards
Yin, Fengwei

> 
>> ---
>>  mm/huge_memory.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> index 032fb0ef9cd1..2a1df2c24c8e 100644
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -2799,12 +2799,19 @@ void free_transhuge_page(struct page *page)
>>  	struct deferred_split *ds_queue = get_deferred_split_queue(folio);
>>  	unsigned long flags;
>>  
>> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
>> -	if (!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
>> -		ds_queue->split_queue_len--;
>> -		list_del(&folio->_deferred_list);
>> +	/*
>> +	 * At this point, there is no one trying to add the folio to
>> +	 * deferred_list. If folio is not in deferred_list, it's safe
>> +	 * to check without acquiring the split_queue_lock.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (data_race(!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list))) {
>> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
>> +		if (!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
>> +			ds_queue->split_queue_len--;
>> +			list_del(&folio->_deferred_list);
>> +		}
>> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
>>  	}
>> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
>>  	free_compound_page(page);
>>  }




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux