Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] THP: avoid lock when check whether THP is in deferred list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 04:27:58PM +0800, Yin Fengwei wrote:
> free_transhuge_page() acquires split queue lock then check
> whether the THP was added to deferred list or not. It brings
> high deferred queue lock contention.
> 
> It's safe to check whether the THP is in deferred list or not
> without holding the deferred queue lock in free_transhuge_page()
> because when code hit free_transhuge_page(), there is no one
> tries to add the folio to _deferred_list.
> 
> Running page_fault1 of will-it-scale + order 2 folio for anonymous
> mapping with 96 processes on an Ice Lake 48C/96T test box, we could
> see the 61% split_queue_lock contention:
> -   63.02%     0.01%  page_fault1_pro  [kernel.kallsyms]         [k] free_transhuge_page
>    - 63.01% free_transhuge_page
>       + 62.91% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
> 
> With this patch applied, the split_queue_lock contention is less
> than 1%.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux