Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 9:42 PM Hillf Danton <hdanton@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 25 Apr 2023 07:19:48 -0700 Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > So is this an explicit NAK on this approach, then? > > Ah I see your point. You misunderstood because I dont think NAk is needed > in 99.999% cases, given the fact that 1) your patch will never be able to > escape from standing ovation 2) every mutex_trylock() hints the straws in mind. I'm afraid I'm still super confused about what you're saying. You think I should abandon this patch series, or that it might be OK to continue with it? -Doug
