On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 12:02:46PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2012 10:41:50 +0200
> Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > --- a/fs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/inode.c
> > @@ -544,8 +544,7 @@ static void evict(struct inode *inode)
> > if (op->evict_inode) {
> > op->evict_inode(inode);
> > } else {
> > - if (inode->i_data.nrpages)
> > - truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
> > + truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
>
> Why did we lose this optimisation?
For inodes with only shadow pages remaining in the tree, because there
is no separate counter for them. Otherwise, we'd leak the tree nodes.
I had mapping->nrshadows at first to keep truncation conditional, but
thought that using an extra word per cached inode would be worse than
removing this optimization. There is not too much being done when the
tree is empty.
Another solution would be to include the shadows count in ->nrpages,
but filesystems use this counter for various other purposes.
Do you think it's worth reconsidering?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>