Re: [Lsf-pc] LSFMMBPF proposal [MM]: Eliminate vmap/vmalloc lock contention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 24-04-23 09:44:00, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Tue 28-02-23 17:42:43, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > > > Hello, LSF.
> > > > 
> > > > Title: Introduce a per-cpu-vmap-cache to eliminate a vmap lock contention
> > > > 
> > > > Description:
> > > >  Currently the vmap code is not scaled to number of CPU cores in a system
> > > >  because a global vmap space is protected by a single spinlock. Such approach
> > > >  has a clear bottleneck if many CPUs simultaneously access to one resource.
> > > > 
> > > >  In this talk i would like to describe a drawback, show some data related
> > > >  to contentions and places where those occur in a code. Apart of that i
> > > >  would like to share ideas how to eliminate it providing a few approaches
> > > >  and compare them.
> > > 
> > > It's been some time since you brough this up. Has there been any
> > > progress on the topic? Do you still find it important to discuss it at
> > > LSFMM?
> > > 
> > The idea about sequence was/is:
> > 
> > 1) Give an overview on the proposal;
> > 2) Submit patches to address the problem;
> > 3) Start a discussion over lkml with people who are interested in it;
> > 4) Send out a complete solution.
> 
> Thanks for the clarification. The usual LSFMM format is strongly
> discussion focused. Long presentations are usually discouraged and they
> should only introduce people to the underlying problem to kick of a
> discussion.
> 
I have not posted yet any RFC and have not kicked it yet. Though people
are aware the problem.

>
> That being said, IMO it would be helpful to have some material on the
> mailing list before any discussion could be productive.
> 
This is what i have so far:

wget ftp://vps418301.ovh.net/incoming/Fix_a_vmalloc_lock_contention_in_SMP_env.pdf

I can, of course, move it forward over lkml only. If you are fully
booked or there other reason then please just withdraw my proposal
from your conference.

--
Uladzislau Rezki




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux