On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm working on a patch which address this issue. debugfs_create_XXX calls
will return proper error codes, and fixing the existing code not each and every part but the code
which handles the values returned by debufs_create_XXX otherwise it will break the existing
functionality . (any suggestions or opinions ?)
.
Thanks
Sasi
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 01:29:52 +0530hm, why the switch to -ENOMEM?
Sasikantha babu <sasikanth.v19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 1) Removed already created debug fs entries on failure
>
> 2) Fixed coding style 80 char per line
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasikantha babu <sasikanth.v19@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index a44eab3..5553723 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -966,11 +966,19 @@ static int __init memblock_init_debugfs(void)
> {
> struct dentry *root = debugfs_create_dir("memblock", NULL);
> if (!root)
> - return -ENXIO;
> - debugfs_create_file("memory", S_IRUGO, root, &memblock.memory, &memblock_debug_fops);
> - debugfs_create_file("reserved", S_IRUGO, root, &memblock.reserved, &memblock_debug_fops);
> + return -ENOMEM;
Just for consistency (But its dumb mistake I made).
Fact is, debugfs_create_dir() and debugfs_create_file() are stupid
interfaces which don't provide the caller (and hence the user) with any
information about why they failed. Perhaps memblock_init_debugfs()
should return -EWESUCK.
I'm working on a patch which address this issue. debugfs_create_XXX calls
will return proper error codes, and fixing the existing code not each and every part but the code
which handles the values returned by debufs_create_XXX otherwise it will break the existing
functionality . (any suggestions or opinions ?)
.
Thanks
Sasi
> + if (!debugfs_create_file("memory", S_IRUGO, root, &memblock.memory,
> + &memblock_debug_fops))
> + goto fail;
> + if (!debugfs_create_file("reserved", S_IRUGO, root, &memblock.reserved,
> + &memblock_debug_fops))
> + goto fail;
>
> return 0;
> +fail:
> + debugfs_remove_recursive(root);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
> __initcall(memblock_init_debugfs);