On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 10:50 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:56:24 +0200 Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> > > > The data from you and David (lat_nice: -12 throughput: -.9% to 0.25%) is > supporting eevdf, given a optimization <5% could be safely ignored in general > (while 10% good and 20% standing ovation). > There's nothing pro or con here, David's testing seems to agree with my own testing that a bit of adjustment may be necessary and that's it. Cold hard numbers to developer, completely optional mitigation tweak to fellow tester.. and we're done. -Mike