On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 10:31:53AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote: > On Wed, 2023-04-05 at 18:54 +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote: > > + * For all of these cases, we have no way of finding out whether these > > + * pages were related to the memcg under reclaim. For example, a freed > > + * slab page could have had only a single object charged to the memcg > > Minor nits: > s/could have had/could have No ... "could have had" is correct. I'm a native English speaker, so I have no idea what the rule here is, but I can ask my linguist wife later if you want to know ;-) Maybe it's something like this: https://www.englishgrammar.org/have-had-and-had-had/
