On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 07:06:35PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 05.04.23 04:26, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > This has no functional change, just moves a routine earlier > > as we'll make use of it next. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > I'd simply squash into #3, as that's short enough that the move doesn't add > significant noise. Anyhow: I'll fold that, thanks. > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> What would be *really* nice, if you can, is an output of the new module debugfs stats on your big system. It would be nice to also see the stats if you revert the patch "module: avoid allocation if module is already present and ready". The delta between those stats should give us a more realistic analysis of probable savings due to that patch on virtual memory on bootup on a large system. In particular the delta between "Virtual mem wasted bytes". Luis