On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 20:42:28 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Liam recommends using mas_walk() instead of mas_find() for our use case so > let's do that, it avoids some minor overhead associated with being able to > restart the operation which we don't need since we do a simple search. > > Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] regmap: Use mas_walk() instead of mas_find() commit: fac79bad889bb167a37492181646992c8c48903b All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
