* Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> [230403 16:00]:
> Liam recommends using mas_walk() instead of mas_find() for our use case so
> let's do that, it avoids some minor overhead associated with being able to
> restart the operation which we don't need since we do a simple search.
>
> Suggested-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/base/regmap/regcache-maple.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regcache-maple.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regcache-maple.c
> index 497cc708d277..5d1bc3691830 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/regmap/regcache-maple.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regcache-maple.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@ static int regcache_maple_read(struct regmap *map,
>
> rcu_read_lock();
>
> - entry = mas_find(&mas, reg);
> + mas.index = reg;
> + mas.last = reg;
You don't need to set mas.index/mas.last here. You have done so with
MA_STATE(mas, mt, reg, reg); above with the last two arguments.
> + entry = mas_walk(&mas);
> if (!entry) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return -ENOENT;
> @@ -47,7 +49,9 @@ static int regcache_maple_write(struct regmap *map, unsigned int reg,
>
> rcu_read_lock();
>
> - entry = mas_find(&mas, reg);
> + mas.index = reg;
> + mas.last = reg;
Same here.
> + entry = mas_walk(&mas);
> if (entry) {
> entry[reg - mas.index] = val;
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> ---
> base-commit: f033c26de5a5734625d2dd1dc196745fae186f1b
> change-id: 20230403-regmap-maple-walk-fine-982bbd2dcfe5
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
