On 04/25/2012 03:31 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:29:31 -0700 > >> On 04/25/2012 03:28 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> >>> All indexes in memblock are integers. Changing that particular one to >>> unsigned int doesn't fix anything. I think it just makes things more >>> confusing. If there ever are cases w/ more then 2G memblocks, we're >>> going for 64bit not unsigned. >>> >> >> I would expect there to be plenty of memblocks larger than 2G? > > Yes, but not the array indexes into those memblock entries, which is > what this patch is about. OIC... more than 2^31 memblocks. -hpa -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>