(2012/04/21 6:57), Glauber Costa wrote: > This patch adds the basic infrastructure for the accounting of the slab > caches. To control that, the following files are created: > > * memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes > * memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes > * memory.kmem.failcnt > * memory.kmem.max_usage_in_bytes > > They have the same meaning of their user memory counterparts. They reflect > the state of the "kmem" res_counter. > > The code is not enabled until a limit is set. This can be tested by the flag > "kmem_accounted". This means that after the patch is applied, no behavioral > changes exists for whoever is still using memcg to control their memory usage. > Hmm, res_counter never goes naeative ? > We always account to both user and kernel resource_counters. This effectively > means that an independent kernel limit is in place when the limit is set > to a lower value than the user memory. A equal or higher value means that the > user limit will always hit first, meaning that kmem is effectively unlimited. > > People who want to track kernel memory but not limit it, can set this limit > to a very high number (like RESOURCE_MAX - 1page - that no one will ever hit, > or equal to the user memory) > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> > CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> The code itself seems fine. Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>