On 3/24/23 03:19, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 16:22:38 +0530 Chaitanya S Prakash <chaitanyas.prakash@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The va_128TBswitch selftest is designed and implemented for PowerPC and >> x86 architectures which support a 128TB switch, up to 256TB of virtual >> address space and hugepage sizes of 16MB and 2MB respectively. Arm64 >> platforms on the other hand support a 256Tb switch, up to 4PB of virtual >> address space and a default hugepage size of 512MB when 64k pagesize is >> enabled. >> >> These architectural differences require introducing support for arm64 >> platforms, after which a more generic naming convention is suggested. >> The in code comments are amended to provide a more platform independent >> explanation of the working of the code and nr_hugepages are configured >> as required. Finally, the file running the testcase is modified in order >> to prevent skipping of hugetlb testcases of va_high_addr_switch. >> >> This series has been tested on 6.3.0-rc3 kernel, both on arm64 and x86 >> platforms. > > Would it make sense to get this series into the ARM tree, so it sees > more testing on ARM Rather, it will be better for this series to go via the mm tree instead (via linux-next first) for better coverage on all platforms, this being a common test.
