On 3/21/23 09:50, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 9:47 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, 2023-03-21 at 09:30 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > sh/migor_defconfig: >> > >> > mm/slab.c: In function ‘slab_memory_callback’: >> > mm/slab.c:1127:23: error: implicit declaration of function ‘init_cache_node_node’; did you mean ‘drain_cache_node_node’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> > 1127 | ret = init_cache_node_node(nid); >> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> > | drain_cache_node_node >> > >> > The #ifdef condition protecting the definition of init_cache_node_node() >> > no longer matches the conditions protecting the (multiple) users. >> > >> > Fix this by syncing the conditions. >> > >> > Fixes: 76af6a054da40553 ("mm/migrate: add CPU hotplug to demotion #ifdef") >> > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b5bdea22-ed2f-3187-6efe-0c72330270a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > mm/slab.c | 2 +- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c >> > index ba454246ee13dd4d..de1523a78f2e7367 100644 >> > --- a/mm/slab.c >> > +++ b/mm/slab.c >> > @@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static int init_cache_node(struct kmem_cache *cachep, int node, gfp_t gfp) >> > return 0; >> > } >> > >> > -#if (defined(CONFIG_NUMA) && defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG)) || defined(CONFIG_SMP) >> > +#if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) || defined(CONFIG_SMP) >> > /* >> > * Allocates and initializes node for a node on each slab cache, used for >> > * either memory or cpu hotplug. If memory is being hot-added, the kmem_cache_node >> >> FWIW, the other #ifdef starting at drain_cache_node_node() closes with "#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */", >> while this #ifdef just ends with "#endif". Just in case you want to make this consistent. > > I guess that's fine, as init_cache_node_node() is a small function. > #endif comments are typically used when the start and end markers > do not fit on your (80x25 ;-) screen. Agreed with this reasoning. >> Reviewed-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks! Applied to slab/for-6.3-rc4/fixes, thanks! > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert >