Re: [RFC] propagate gfp_t to page table alloc functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(2012/04/23 17:55), Minchan Kim wrote:

> As I test some code, I found a problem about deadlock by lockdep.
> The reason I saw the message is __vmalloc calls map_vm_area which calls
> pud/pmd_alloc without gfp_t. so although we call __vmalloc with
> GFP_ATOMIC or GFP_NOIO, it ends up allocating pages with GFP_KERNEL.
> The should be a BUG. This patch fixes it by passing gfp_to to low page
> table allocate functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>


Hmm ? vmalloc should support GFP_ATOMIC ?

And, do we need to change all pud_,pgd_,pmd_,pte_alloc() for users pgtables ?

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]