forgot to mention, On 04/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Just it seems to me there are to many "details" > we should discuss to make the filtering reasonable. And so far we assumed that consumer->filter() is "stable" and never changes its mind. Perhaps this is fine, but I am not sure. May we need need some interface to add/del the task. Probably not, but unregister + register doesn't look very convenient and can miss a hit. > Yes, and probably this makes sense for handler_chain(). Although otoh > I do not really understand what this filter buys us at this point. But if we change the rules so that ->filter() or ->handler() itself can return the "please remove this bp from ->mm" then perhaps it makes more sense for the filtering. Again, not sure. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>